Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284928›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2023

The Efficacy and Safety of Parecoxib Multimodal Preemptive Analgesia in Artificial Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Zhuoqi Ge, Mingnian Li, Yu Chen, Yufeng Sun, Rui Zhang, Jiaxing Zhang, Xue Bai, Yanyan Zhang, Qi Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuoqi GeDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, China.
Mingnian LiCollege of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Yu ChenCollege of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Yufeng SunCollege of Pharmacy, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, China.
Jiaxing ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, China.
Xue BaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, China.
Yanyan ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550025, China. chinazyy201@163.com.
Qi ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550002, China. chenqi@gz5055.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3621-8170
Guiyang Medical University · CNGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNGuiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

Guizhou Province's high -level innovative talent "thousands levels" training funds GZSYQCC[2023]008Science and Technology Fund of Guizhou Provincial Health GZWKJ2021-553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pain after artificial joint replacement is intense and remains an unsolved problem. Some studies have shown that parecoxib can provide better analgesia in postoperative multimodal analgesia, however, doubts arise about whether its multimodal preemptive analgesia can reduce postoperative pain.

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of preoperative injection of parecoxib on postoperative pain in patients undergoing artificial joint replacement. STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

settingEmbase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wangfang databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. The last search was in May 2022.

methodsRandomized controlled trials of efficacy and adverse reactions of intra-operative and postoperative injection of parecoxib in artificial joint replacement were collected. The primary outcome was postoperative visual analog scale scores and the secondary outcomes included cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of adverse reactions. Using the Cochrane systematic review method to screen the studies, evaluate the quality of the included studies, and extract feature information, RevMan 5.4 software performs a meta-analysis of the corresponding research indicators.

resultsIn total, nine studies were involved in the meta-analysis with 667 patients. The trial and control group were given the same dose of parecoxib or placebo at the same time point before and after surgery. The results showed that compared with the control group, the trial group is associated with substantially reduced visual analog scale scores in 24, 48 h at rest (P < 0.05), visual analog scale scores in 24, 48, 72 h at movement (P < 0.05), dose of opioid need in trial group is notably lower than that in control group (P < 0.05), but shows no obvious effect on visual analog scale scores in 72 h at rest, and adverse events (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The major limitation of this meta-analysis relates to some low-quality studies.

conclusionsOur results support parecoxib multimodal preemptive analgesia in reducing postoperative acute pain in hip and knee replacement patients, and reduces cumulative opioid consumption without increasing the risk of adverse drug events. Its multimodal preemptive analgesia is safe and effective in hip and knee replacement. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022379672.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaArtificial hip replacementArtificial knee replacementMeta-analysisMultimodal preemptive analgesiaParecoxib

Identifiers

PMID37284928
PMCPMC10290003
OpenAlexW4379599426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.