Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284918›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2024

For Submission to the Journal of Community Health: Carbon Monoxide Awareness and Detector Use in the State of Wisconsin.

Bianca Silva Gordon, Kristen M C Malecki, Jennifer Camponeschi, Tamara J LeCaire, Paul D Creswell, Amy A Schultz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bianca Silva GordonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, United States.
Kristen M C MaleckiUniversity of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, Chicago, United States.
Jennifer CamponeschiWisconsin Department of Health Services, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, Madison, United States.
Tamara J LeCaireUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, United States.
Paul D CreswellWisconsin Department of Health Services, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, Madison, United States.
Amy A SchultzUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, United States. aaschultz4@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5400-0370

Funding

Wisconsin Partnership Program 233 AAG9971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a leading cause of poisoning. CO detectors are a known-effective prevention strategy, however, little is known about use of detectors or knowledge of risk. This study assessed awareness of CO poisoning risk, detector laws, and detector use among a statewide sample. Data collected from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW) included a CO Monitoring module added to the in-home interview for 466 participants representing unique households across Wisconsin in 2018-2019. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between demographic characteristics, awareness of CO laws and detector use. Less than half of households had a verified CO detector. Under 46% were aware of the detector law. Those aware had 2.82 greater odds of having a detector in the home compared to those unaware of the law. Lack of CO law awareness may lead to less frequent detector use and result in higher risk of CO poisoning. This highlights the need for CO risk and detector education to decrease poisonings.

Indexed as

Carbon MonoxideCarbon Monoxide PoisoningHealth SurveysHumansPeriodicals as TopicPublic HealthWisconsinCarbon MonoxideCarbon MonoxidePolicy AwarenessPreventionPublic Health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.