ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023
Photosealing of dural defects using a biocompatible patch.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Photochemically Sealed Commercial Biomembranes for Nerve Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePhotosealing of many biological tissues can be achieved using a biocompatible material in combination with a dye that is activated by visible light to chemically bond over the tissue defect via protein cross-linking reactions. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of photosealing using a commercially available biomembrane (AmnioExcel Plus) to securely close dural defects in comparison to another sutureless method (fibrin glue) in terms of repair strength.
methodsTwo-millimeter diameter holes were created in dura harvested from New Zealand white rabbits and repaired ex vivo using one of two methods: (1) in n = 10 samples, photosealing was used to bond a 6-mm-diameter AmnioExcel Plus patch over the dural defect, and (2) in n = 10 samples, fibrin glue was used to attach the same patch over the dural defect. Repaired dura samples were then subjected to burst pressure testing. Histological analysis was also performed of photosealed dura.
resultsThe mean burst pressures of rabbit dura repaired with photosealing and fibrin glue were 302 ± 149 mmHg and 26 ± 24 mmHg, respectively. The increased repair strength using photosealing was statistically significant and considerably higher than the normal intracranial pressure of ~ 20 mmHg. Histology demonstrated a tight union at the interface between the dura surface and patch with no disruption of the dura structure.
conclusionThe results of this study suggest that photosealing performs better than fibrin glue for the fixation of a patch for ex vivo repair of small dural defects. Photosealing is worthy of testing in pre-clinical models for the repair of dural defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.