ArticleGland surgery2023
Clinical experience of the Magseed
Article in Gland surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative Magnetic Seed Versus Wire-Guided Localization in the Treatment of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Center.International journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- Reliability of Magseed® marking before neoadjuvant systemic therapy with subsequent contrast-enhanced mammography in patients with non-palpable breast cancer lesions after treatment: the MAGMA study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Observational
- Magseed preoperative localization in non-palpable breast lesions: Our single-center Breast Unit experience.Journal of public health research · 2024Article
- Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to report on a cohort of 100 patients where the Magseed Methods: Data were collected from a cohort of 100 patients with non-palpable breast lesions, who underwent localization using the Magseed Results: All 111 seeds were successfully placed in the breasts of 100 patients under ultrasound or via stereotactic guidance. Eighty-nine seeds were inserted in single lesions or small microcalcification clusters in a single breast, 12 seeds were deployed to a bracket microcalcification clusters and 10 to help localize two tumors within the same breast. Most Magseed Conclusions: This study reports our experience in a Belgian breast unit using the Magseed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.