ArticleGland surgery2023
Cardiac exposure in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing deep inspiratory breath hold radiation therapy.
Article in Gland surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Clinical evaluation using first-day assessment of patient suitability for successful performance of deep inspiration breath-hold for breast cancer radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left-sided breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing post-operative radiation therapy (PRT) may have higher risk of late cardiovascular toxicity, which may be reduced by hearth-sparing RT techniques. This study evaluated dosimetric parameters of the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) compared to free breathing (FB) RT. We analysed factors impacting on doses to the heart and cardiac substructures and sought anatomic factors allowing patient selection for DIBH. Methods: The study group included 67 left-sided BC patients who underwent RT after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. Patients treated with DIBH were trained to hold their breath. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed in both FB and DIBH patients. Plans were generated using 3-dimensional (3D) conformal RT. The dosimetric variables were obtained from dose-volume histograms, and the anatomical variables were derived from the CT scans. The variables in the two groups were compared by Results: Compared to the FB, DIBH allowed for a mean dose reduction to the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), left ventricle (LV), and right ventricle (RV) by 30.0%, 38.7%, 39.3%, and 34.7%, respectively. DIBH markedly increased the heart height (HH), heart chest wall distance (HCWD), the mean distance between the ipsilateral lung and breast (DBIB), and decreased the heart-chest wall length (HCWL) (P<0.05). The different value of HH, DBIB, HCWL, and HCWD between DIBH and FB were 1.31, 1.95, -0.67, and 0.22 cm, respectively (all P<0.05). ΔHH was an independent predictor of the mean dose to the heart, LAD, LV, and RV, with the area under the curve values of 0.818, 0.725, 0.821, and 0.820, respectively. Conclusions: DIBH significantly reduced the dose to the entire heart and its substructures in left-sided BC patients undergoing post-operative RT. ΔHH predicts the mean dose to the heart and its substructures. These results may inform patient selection for DIBH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.