ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2023
Investigating the Moral Sensitivity of Medical Students in the Preclinical and Late Clinical Courses.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paying attention to moral issues is one of the essential requirements of medical practice, and moral aspects must be considered in making decisions to achieve the desired results and ensure the patient's satisfaction. Moral sensitivity is one of the components that enable physicians to act ethically in their decisions. Since medical students must acquire the necessary skills to deal with patients properly in clinical courses, the current paper examines the moral sensitivity of medical students in both preclinical and late clinical courses. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study performed on 180 medical students in the preclinical and late clinical course. The study tool is an adapted version of the Kim-Lutzen ethical sensitivity questionnaire with 25 items and Likert scoring 0-4. The obtained score can be between 0-100. Data was analyzed using SPSS25. Statistical t-test or its non-parametric equivalent (Mann-Whitney) was used for quantitative variables and Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used for qualitative variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to measure the correlation of the variables. Results: The mean age of stagers and interns was 22.7 + 0.85, and 26.5 + 1.11. 41 (51.2%) of stagers and 51 (63.7%) of interns had a history of participating in workshops related to medical ethics, and 4 (5%) of the former and 3 (3.8%) of the latter had previously conducted research in the field of medical ethics. there was a significant relationship between the stagers' history of conducting research in the field of ethics and their moral sensitivity. Concerning moral sensitivity components, the highest scores belonged to "altruism and trustworthiness", "the use of moral concepts in moral decisions", and "respect for the patient's autonomy" in both groups., 95% of stagers and 98.8% of interns had medium level (51-75) of moral sensitivity. Conclusion: Medical students' moral sensitivity did not increase significantly during the clinical course. It is necessary to review and reconsider medical ethics educational methods, the time allocated to relevant courses, and the practical need for clinical education in addition to theory. Directing research projects and student dissertations toward topics related to medical ethics can also contribute significantly to enhancing moral sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.