Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284676›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2023

Patient Self-Testing of Kidney Function at Home, a Prospective Clinical Feasibility Study in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Jonathan S Murray, Cameron J Williams, Clare Lendrem, Joanne Smithson, Clare Allinson, Jennifer Robinson, Alycon Walker, Amanda Winter, A John Simpson, Julia Newton and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07777523 (Noninvasive, Multiplex and Portable Testing of Urea and Potassium to Enable Patient-Centered Monitoring of End-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07777523 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Noninvasive, Multiplex and Portable Testing of Urea and Potassium to Enable Patient-Centered Monitoring of End-Stage Chronic Kidney Disease

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorGisens BiotechRan2025 to 2025Enrolled55ConditionsRenal Disease, Chronic, Renal Disease, End-Stage, Dialysis Patients, Urea in BloodArmsKF4+ Noninvasive Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan S MurrayRenal Unit, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Cameron J WilliamsNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostic Cooperative, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clare LendremNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostic Cooperative, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Joanne SmithsonAcademic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Clare AllinsonRenal Unit, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Jennifer RobinsonRenal Unit, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Alycon WalkerRenal Unit, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Amanda WinterNorth East Innovation Laboratory, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
A John SimpsonNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostic Cooperative, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Julia NewtonAcademic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Caroline WroeFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
William S JonesNIHR Newcastle In Vitro Diagnostic Cooperative, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNIHR Leeds In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative · GBAcademic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: People with long-term health conditions often attend clinics for kidney function tests. The Self-Testing Own Kidneys (STOK) study assessed feasibility of kidney transplant recipients using hand-held devices to self-test kidney function at home and investigated agreement between home self-test and standard clinic test results. Methods: A prospective, observational, single-center, clinical feasibility study (TRN: ISRCTN68116915), with Results: The mean within-patient difference between index and reference test in creatinine was 2.25 μmol/l (95% confidence interval [CI]: -12.13, 16.81 μmol/l) and in potassium was 0.66 mmol/l (95% CI: -1.47, 2.79 mmol/l). All creatinine pairs and 27 of 40 (67.5%) potassium pairs were judged clinically equivalent. Planned follow-up analysis suggests that biochemical variables associated with potassium measurement in capillary blood were predominant sources of paired test result differences. Paired patient and nurse i-STAT capillary blood test potassium results were not statistically significantly different. Conclusions: This small feasibility study observed that training selected patients to competently use hand-held devices to self-test kidney function at home is possible. Self-test creatinine results showed good analytical and clinical agreement with standard clinic test results. Self-test potassium results showed poorer agreement with standard clinic test results; however, patient self-use of i-STATs at home was not a statistically significant source of difference between paired potassium test results.

Indexed as

creatininehomekidneypoint-of-care testpotassiumself-test

Identifiers

PMID37284676
PMCPMC10239793
OpenAlexW4361224301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.