Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284395›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Antifungal Efficacy of Pure Garlic, Onion, and Lemon Extracts Against Candida albicans.

Rita M Khounganian, Abdulaziz Alwakeel, Abdulhakim Albadah, Abdulrahman Nakshabandi, Shahad Alharbi, Ahmed S Almslam

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of the Cytotoxic Mechanisms of Different Garlic (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rita M KhounganianOral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulaziz AlwakeelOral Medicine and Oral Pathology, Tabuk Dental Center, Tabuk, SAU.
Abdulhakim AlbadahMicrobiology Laboratory, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulrahman NakshabandiOral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Shahad AlharbiOral Medicine and Oral Pathology, Buraidah Central Hospital, Buraydah, SAU.
Ahmed S AlmslamDentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Buraydah Colleges · SAHarvard University Press · USKanagawa Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe oral cavity is considered to be one of the most intricate environments in the human body. It is known to harbor commensal microorganisms that do not cause diseases, such as

objectivesTo evaluate the antifungal efficacy of pure garlic, onion, and lemon juice extracts against

resultsThe diameter of inhibition zones has been measured along the vertical and horizontal axis. No inhibition zones were observed for the onion and lemon extracts used in this study whereas the garlic extract exhibited inhibition zones with altered sizes (4.89 ± 0.275). A highly significant difference was observed between groups (P = 0.000) and between garlic and the other materials (P = 0.000).

conclusionsPure garlic showed a highly significant antifungal efficacy when compared to the onion and lemon juice extracts against

Indexed as

antifungal efficacycandida albicansgarliclemon juice extractonion

Identifiers

PMID37284395
PMCPMC10241316
OpenAlexW4379599510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.