Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284373›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Status of Contraceptive Use for Birth Spacing After a Teenage Pregnancy: Where Do We Stand?

Anupma A, Avir Sarkar, Priyanka Sharma, Sonam Jindal, Jagadish C Sharma

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anupma AObstetrics and Gynecology, Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, IND.
Avir SarkarObstetrics and Gynecology, Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, IND.
Priyanka SharmaObstetrics and Gynecology, Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, IND.
Sonam JindalObstetrics and Gynecology, Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, IND.
Jagadish C SharmaObstetrics and Gynecology, Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Faridabad, IND.
Employees' State Insurance Model Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is the most complex stage of reproductive health. The knowledge and awareness of adolescent-related reproductive issues are limited, particularly in lower-middle-income countries. Adolescent pregnancies are associated with major maternal and neonatal complications. Effective contraception use can prevent teenage pregnancy and subsequent complications.

methodsIt was a cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care hospital and teaching institute over a period of one year. Through this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of postpartum use of approved standard methods of contraception for birth spacing among teenage mothers and to assess the reasons for their non-acceptance. A total of 133 consecutive consenting postpartum teenage mothers were recruited in the study. Participants were asked about their age at the time of marriage and delivery, marital status, parity, education and economic status, the number of antenatal visits, mode of delivery, and antenatal complications. Compliance with postpartum contraception was noted, and reasons for its non-acceptance were asked in detail.

resultsAmong the 133 participants, contraceptive users were categorized into Group A and non-users into Group B. The mean age at the time of marriage was 17.6±0.4 and 17.5±0.6 years in Group A and Group B, respectively. Mothers in Group A were more educated than their counterparts in Group B (82.2% of mothers were educated up to 12th standard in Group A compared to 46.6% in Group B). Among the contraception users, 70% had four or more antenatal visits compared to 7.9% of the non-users. Reasons for non-acceptance of postpartum contraception were elicited in Group B: 42.0% had fear of becoming infertile, 38.6% feared that contraceptives interfere with breastfeeding and quality of breastmilk, 13.6% had opposition from family members, and 5.8% did not mention any reason.

conclusionTeenage pregnancy is associated with increased feto-maternal complications. It also accounts for an increased incidence of unsafe abortions and maternal mortality. So it is crucial to make the adolescent group aware of effective methods of postpartum contraceptives to prevent adolescent pregnancies. Collaborative larger multicentric studies from different countries will help to reach a better, generalized conclusion regarding the same.

Indexed as

adolescent pregnancycontraceptionfamily planningpostpartum contraceptionteenage pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37284373
PMCPMC10239535
OpenAlexW4379600413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.