Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284274›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2023

Hongwei Liu, Keita Nomoto, Anna V Ceguerra, Jamie J Kruzic, Julie Cairney, Simon P Ringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongwei LiuAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7500-9649
Keita NomotoSchool of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Anna V CeguerraAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Jamie J KruzicSchool of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-1921
Julie CairneyAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Simon P RingerAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-330X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pair distribution function (PDF) analysis is a powerful technique to understand atomic scale structure in materials science. Unlike X-ray diffraction (XRD)-based PDF analysis, the PDF calculated from electron diffraction patterns (EDPs) using transmission electron microscopy can provide structural information from specific locations with high spatial resolution. The present work describes a new software tool for both periodic and amorphous structures that addresses several practical challenges in calculating the PDF from EDPs. The key features of this program include accurate background subtraction using a nonlinear iterative peak-clipping algorithm and automatic conversion of various types of diffraction intensity profiles into a PDF without requiring external software. The present study also evaluates the effect of background subtraction and the elliptical distortion of EDPs on PDF profiles. The

Indexed as

computer programselectron diffraction patternspair distribution functions

Identifiers

PMID37284274
PMCPMC10241047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.