ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2023
Implementation of grain mapping by diffraction contrast tomography on a conventional laboratory tomography setup with various detectors.
Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-area flat-panel detector versus conventional detector for full-spine digital radiography: a retrospective comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Forward-model-based grain reconstruction to improve the tolerance of diffraction contrast tomography for increased sample deformation.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory-based diffraction contrast tomography (LabDCT) is a novel technique used to resolve grain orientations and shapes in three dimensions at the micrometre scale using laboratory X-ray sources, allowing the user to overcome the constraint of limited access to synchrotron facilities. To foster the development of this technique, the implementation of LabDCT is illustrated in detail using a conventional laboratory-based X-ray tomography setup, and it is shown that such implementation is possible with the two most common types of detectors: CCD and flat panel. As a benchmark, LabDCT projections were acquired on an AlCu alloy sample using the two types of detectors at different exposure times. Grain maps were subsequently reconstructed using the open-source grain reconstruction method reported in the authors' previous work. To characterize the detection limit and the spatial resolution for the current implementation, the reconstructed LabDCT grain maps were compared with the map obtained from a synchrotron measurement, which is considered as ground truth. The results show that the final grain maps from measurements by the CCD and flat panel detector are similar and show comparable quality, while the CCD gives a much better contrast-to-noise ratio than the flat panel. The analysis of the grain maps reconstructed from measurements with different exposure times suggests that a grain map of comparable quality could be obtained in less than 1 h total acquisition time without a significant loss of grain reconstruction quality and indicates a clear potential for time-lapse LabDCT experiments. The current implementation is suggested to promote the generic use of the LabDCT technique for grain mapping on conventional tomography setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.