Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284189›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among individuals receiving first-line pembrolizumab therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Christopher M Black, Glenn J Hanna, Liya Wang, Karthik Ramakrishnan, Daisuke Goto, Vladimir Turzhitsky, Gleicy M Hair

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-TTCC clinical guidelines for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M BlackCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Glenn J HannaCenter for Head & Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Liya WangCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Karthik RamakrishnanCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Daisuke GotoCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Vladimir TurzhitskyCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Gleicy M HairCenter for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, is approved as first-line (1L) treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) as monotherapy or in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Limited data exist on the use of these regimens in real-world settings. Objective: Our primary objectives were to describe baseline characteristics and real-world overall survival (rwOS), time on treatment (rwToT), and time to next treatment (rwTTNT) among individuals with R/M HNSCC receiving approved 1L pembrolizumab therapies. We also aimed to identify baseline factors associated with choice of 1L pembrolizumab therapy and with rwOS. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with R/M HNSCC receiving 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess real-world outcomes, logistic regression modeling to identify factors associated with choice of 1L pembrolizumab therapy, and Cox proportional hazards models to identify factors associated with rwOS. Results: The study population included 431 individuals receiving 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy and 215 receiving 1L pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. The use of 1L pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with higher baseline combined positive score for PD-L1 expression, older age, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), laryngeal tumor site, and human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumor status. The pembrolizumab monotherapy group had a median (95% CI) rwOS of 12.1 (9.2-15.1) months, rwToT of 4.2 (3.5-4.6) months, and rwTTNT of 6.5 (5.4-7.4) months. Among this group, HPV-positive tumor status and lower ECOG PS were associated with longer rwOS, and oral cavity tumor site with shorter rwOS. The pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy cohort had a median (95% CI) rwOS of 11.9 (9.0-16.0) months, rwToT of 4.9 (3.8-5.6) months, and rwTTNT of 6.6 (5.8-8.3) months. In this group, HPV-positive tumor status was associated with longer rwOS. Conclusions: This study adds to clinical trial data by summarizing real-world treatment outcomes with 1L pembrolizumab-containing therapies in a more heterogeneous population. Overall survival outcomes in both treatment groups were similar to those observed in the registration clinical trial. These findings support the use of pembrolizumab as standard of care for R/M HNSCC.

Indexed as

antibodiesantineoplastic agentshead and neck squamous cell carcinomaimmunologicalKaplan-Meier estimatepatient outcomesreal-world observational studytreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID37284189
PMCPMC10241070
OpenAlexW4377238167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.