Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284174›Full record

ArticleColombia medica (Cali, Colombia)

Deliberative dialogue on euthanasia in girls, boys and adolescents. Prequel to the Cabildo Ciudadano (Citizen Council) carried out in Colombia.

María Camila Pinzón-Segura, Magnolia Del Pilar Ballesteros-Cabrera, Yefry Andrés Aragón-Joya, Luisa Fernanda Cajamarca-Loaiza, André Noël Roth-Deubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María Camila Pinzón-SeguraDoctorado interfacultades en Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4191-7435
Magnolia Del Pilar Ballesteros-CabreraGrupo de Investigación Estilo de Vida y Desarrollo Humano, Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-4618
Yefry Andrés Aragón-JoyaDepartamento de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5541-672X
Luisa Fernanda Cajamarca-LoaizaGrupo de Investigación Análisis de Políticas Públicas y de la Gestión Pública, Departamento de Ciencias Políticas, Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-7540
André Noël Roth-DeubelGrupo de Investigación Análisis de Políticas Públicas y de la Gestión Pública, Departamento de Ciencias Políticas, Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8056-2035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To date, there is a lack of published information on the utilization of the Deliberative dialogue methodology and the right to a dignified death in minors under 18 years of age in Colombia and Latin America. Objective: To examine the issue of children and adolescents' entitlement to a dignified death, including the criteria for exclusion, and to formulate a comprehensive plan for pediatric palliative care. A public policy document will be created with the aim of supporting the implementation of Resolution 825/2018. Methods: Participatory Action Research utilizing a Deliberative dialogue methods that has been adapted based on feminist epistemological principles. Results: The outcome of the exercise was the production of a document containing Public Policy recommendations regarding euthanasia in minors and its submission to the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia a few days prior to the release of the Resolution regulating the right to a dignified death for this population. Additionally, the conclusions of this event enabled the creation of a guide for the implementation of Conclusions: The deliberative dialogue method may serve as a cost-efficient alternative to replace or complement participatory approaches utilized in the development of public health guidelines and policies.

Indexed as

EuthanasiaHealth PolicyAdolescentChildColombiaFemaleHumansMalePolicy Makingchild healthconsensus conferencedemocracyEuthanasiafeminismpalliative careright to diesocial participation

Identifiers

PMID37284174
PMCPMC10241037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.