Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284125›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Evaluating the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimations using the Hadlock IV formula in a Chinese population.

Jie Ma, Decui Cheng, Zhifang Zhang, Bin Cai, Xianming Xu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie Ma *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, South Hospital of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Decui Cheng *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhifang ZhangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, South Hospital of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Bin CaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, South Hospital of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xianming XuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, South Hospital of Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai First People's Hospital · CNRuijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite being the most generalized formula in China, the Hadlock IV formula has never been examined to determine if it is suitable for Chinese newborns, nor have the factors that might affect its performance been investigated. However, previous studies have reported varying results about other formulas in other nationalities. This study sought to evaluate the performance of the Hadlock IV formula in estimating fetal weight (FW) in pregnant Chinese women and use ultrasound to identify the factors affecting the accuracy of estimations of newborn weight; through these means, we aimed to create a reference for predicting neonatal weight for obstetricians. Methods: A retrospective observational study comprising data from 976 cases of live-birth singleton pregnancies at the Shanghai General Hospital was conducted. The participants' clinical data were examined and subjected to a logistic regression analysis to identify the multitude of possible factors affecting the estimation of FW. The proportions and correlations between the accurate and inaccurate estimation groups were compared to determine the different prognosis of these 2 groups. The correlations between the accuracy of the sonographic-based fetal weight estimation (SFWE) and newborns with different weight ranges were also analyzed. Results: The overall accuracy rate of the SFWE predicted by the Hadlock IV formula was 79.61%, while that of the inaccurate estimation group was only 20.39%. The incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery (VD) was lower in the inaccurate estimation group than in the accurate estimation group (40.7% Conclusions: The overall performance of the Hadlock IV formula in predicting the birth weight of Chinese newborns remains suboptimal. Extra caution should be exercised in cases of suspected large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants, small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants, infants with macrosomia, or LBW fetuses in the Chinese population.

Indexed as

Birth weightChinese pregnant womenestimated fetal weight (EFW)Hadlock IVsonographic-based fetal weight estimation (SFWE)

Identifiers

PMID37284125
PMCPMC10240036
OpenAlexW4362569354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.