ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Cartilage morphometry and magnetic susceptibility measurement for knee osteoarthritis with automatic cartilage segmentation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-based segmentation and quantitative assessment of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- An external reference to enable quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in absolute terms: theoretical considerations, simulations, and experimental evaluation.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Knee Cartilage Segmentation Using a Swin-UNet Conditional Generative Adversarial Network: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Addressing fatty tissue in quantitative susceptibility mapping of human knee cartilage.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Exploring the asynchronous changes of articular cartilage and osteochondral junction in knee osteoarthritis based on T2 mapping and ultrashort echo time imaging: a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence demonstrates potential to enhance orthopaedic imaging across multiple modalities: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the consistency of the MRI- based AI segmentation cartilage model using the natural tibial plateau cartilage.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Automatic segmentation of knee cartilage and quantification of cartilage parameters are crucial for the early detection and treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to develop an automatic cartilage segmentation method for three-dimensional water-selective (3D_WATS) cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conduct cartilage morphometry and magnetic susceptibility measurements such as cartilage thickness, volume, and susceptibility values for knee OA assessment. Methods: Sixty-five consecutively sampled subjects, who had undergone health checks at our hospital, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study and were divided into three groups: 20 normal, 20 mild OA, 25 severe OA. Sagittal 3D_WATS sequence was used to image cartilage at 3T. The raw magnitude images were used for cartilage segmentation and the phase images were used for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)-based assessment. Manual cartilage segmentation was performed by two experienced radiologists, and the automatic segmentation model was constructed using nnU-Net. Quantitative cartilage parameters were extracted from the magnitude and phase images based on the cartilage segmentation. Pearson correlation coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were then used to assess the consistency of obtained cartilage parameters between automatic and manual segmentation. Cartilage thickness, volume, and susceptibility values among different groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Support vector machine (SVM) was used to further verify the classification validity of automatically extracted cartilage parameters. Results: The constructed cartilage segmentation model based on nnU-Net achieved an average Dice score of 0.93. The consistency of cartilage thickness, volume, and susceptibility values calculated using automatic and manual segmentations ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) for the Pearson correlation coefficient, and from 0.91-0.99 (95% CI: 0.86-0.99) for ICC, respectively. Significant differences were found in OA patients; including decreases in cartilage thickness, volume, and mean susceptibility values (P<0.05), and increases in standard deviation (SD) of susceptibility values (P<0.01). Moreover, the automatically extracted cartilage parameters can achieve an AUC value of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for OA classification using the SVM classifier. Conclusions: The 3D_WATS cartilage MR imaging allows simultaneously automated assessment of cartilage morphometry and magnetic susceptibility for evaluating the severity of OA using the proposed cartilage segmentation method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.