Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284115›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Transvaginal ultrasonography predictive model for the detection of pelvic congestion syndrome.

Rocio Garcia-Jimenez, Irene Valero, Carlota Borrero, Jose A Garcia-Mejido, Jose V Gonzalez-Herraez, Andrea V Muñoz-Chimbo, Irene Pelayo-Delgado, Ana Fernandez-Palacin, Jose A Sainz Bueno

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Optimizing Venographic Referrals in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Ultrasound-Based Scoring to Guide Selective Venography.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Venous Disorders in Women.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rocio Garcia-JimenezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Irene ValeroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Carlota BorreroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Jose A Garcia-MejidoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Jose V Gonzalez-HerraezDepartment of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Andrea V Muñoz-ChimboDepartment of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Irene Pelayo-DelgadoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Fernandez-PalacinBiostatistics Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Jose A Sainz BuenoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Hospital Universitario de Valme · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) remains a challenge given the lack of universally accepted criteria. Although venography (VG) is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of PCS, non-invasive techniques like transvaginal ultrasonography (TVU) appear to be a valid alternative. The aim of this study was to design a predictive model for the venographic diagnostic of PCS using the parameters identified by TVU in patients with clinical suspicion of PCS, in order to individually assess the need to perform an invasive diagnostic and therapeutic technique such as VG. Methods: An observational and cross-sectional prospective study was conducted including 61 consecutively recruited patients with clinical suspicion of PCS, who were referred by the Pelvic Floor, Gynecology and Vascular Surgery Units, who were distributed in two groups: 18 belonging to the normal group and 43 to the PCS's group. We implemented and compared 19 binary logistic regression models, including the parameters that showed statistical significance in the prior univariate analysis. We evaluated individual predictive values with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The selected model, based on the presence of pelvic veins or venous plexus of 8 mm or larger, observed by transvaginal ultrasound, had an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.63-0.96; P<0.001), with a sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 0.69, while the VG had a sensitivity of 86.05%, a specificity of 66.67%, and a positive predictive value of 86.05%. Conclusions: This assessment presents a feasible alternative that could potentially be added to our usual gynecological practice.

Indexed as

chronic pelvic pain (CPP)Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS)predictive modeltransvaginal ultrasonography (TVU)venography (VG)

Identifiers

PMID37284115
PMCPMC10240031
OpenAlexW4377102706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.