ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Prediction of intracranial hemorrhage after internal carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis by computed tomography perfusion.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The novel imaging methods in diagnosis and assessment of cerebrovascular diseases: an overview.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To explore the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after internal carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis by computed tomography perfusion (CTP). Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 87 patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis who underwent CTP before CAS were retrospectively analyzed. The absolute values of the cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), and time to peak (TTP) were calculated. The relative values (i.e., the rCBF, rCBV, rMTT, and rTTP), defined as the comparison between ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres, were also derived. The degree of carotid artery stenosis was divided into 3 grades, and the Willis' circle was classified into 4 types. The relationship between the occurrence of the ICH and CTP parameters, the Willis' circle type, and the clinical baseline data were evaluated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the most effective CTP parameter for the prediction of ICH. Results: In total, 8 patients (9.2%) developed ICH after CAS. The results showed that the CBF (P=0.025), MTT (P=0.029), rCBF (P=0.006), rMTT (P=0.004), rTTP (P=0.006), and the degree of carotid artery stenosis (P=0.021) differed significantly between the ICH group and non-ICH group. The ROC curve analysis showed that the CTP parameter with the maximal area under the curve (AUC) for ICH was rMTT (AUC =0.808), which indicated that patients with an rMTT >1.88 were more likely to develop ICH (sensitivity: 62.5%, specificity: 96.2%). The occurrence of ICH after CAS was not related to the type of Willis' circle (P=0.713). Conclusions: CTP can be used to predict ICH after CAS in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis, and patients with a preoperative rMTT >1.88 should be closely monitored for evidence of ICH after CAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.