ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Diagnostic performance and safety of percutaneous fine-needle aspiration immediately before microwave ablation for pulmonary ground-glass nodules.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Expert Consensus on Shared Decision-making in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ground-glass Opacity-featured Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
- Complications of synchronous microwave ablation and biopsy versus microwave ablation alone for pulmonary sub-solid nodules: a retrospective, large sample, case-control study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Imaging diagnostics of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a narrative review with current status and future directions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Combined indocyanine green and medical glue enables stable and precise position in animal studies: promising for fluorescence-guided pulmonary ground glass nodule resection.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
- Ground-glass opacities: a problem bound to get more challenging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study sought to evaluate the safety and diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) immediately before microwave ablation (MWA) for pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the synchronous CT-guided biopsy and MWA data of 92 GGNs (male to female ratio 37:55; age 60.4±12.5 years; size 1.4±0.6 cm). FNA was performed in all patients, and sequential core-needle biopsy (CNB) was performed in 62 patients. The positive diagnosis rate was determined. The diagnostic yield was compared on the basis of the biopsy methods (FNA, CNB, or both), the nodule diameter (<1.5 and ≥1.5 cm), and the lesion component (pure GGN or part-solid GGN). The procedure-related complications were recorded. Results: The technical success rate was 100%. The positive rates of FNA and CNB were 70.7% and 72.6% respectively, but did not differ significantly (P=0.8). Sequential FNA and CNB showed better diagnostic performance (88.7%) than did either alone (P=0.008 and P=0.023, respectively). The diagnostic yield of CNB for pure GGNs was significantly lower than that for part-solid GGNs (P=0.016). The diagnostic yield was lower for smaller nodules (78.3% Conclusions: FNA immediately before MWA is a reliable technique for the diagnosis of GGNs that does not alter the accuracy of the antenna placement. Sequential FNA and CNB improves the diagnostic ability of GGNs compared to either method used alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.