ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Deep learning for the prediction of residual tumor after radiotherapy and treatment decision-making in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Residual Disease in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.World journal of oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-Sequence Fusion MRI Deep Learning Models for Discrimination of Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Osteoradionecrosis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Non-Gaussian diffusion MRI using CTRW and FROC models for early treatment response assessment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Enhancing Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Survival Prediction: Integrating Pre- and Post-Treatment MRI Radiomics with Clinical Data.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- A magnetic resonance imaging-based lymph node regression grading scheme for nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Deciphering the Prognostic Efficacy of MRI Radiomics in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and induction chemotherapy (IC) plus CCRT (IC + CCRT) are the main treatments for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We aimed to develop deep learning (DL) models using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to predict the risk of residual tumor after each of the 2 treatments and to provide a reference for patients to select the best treatment option. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 424 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC who underwent CCRT or IC + CCRT between June 2012 and June 2019 in the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. According to the evaluation of MR images taken 3 to 6 months after radiotherapy, patients were divided into 2 categories: residual tumor and non-residual tumor. Transferred U-net and Deeplabv3 neural networks were trained, and the better-performance segmentation model was used to segment the tumor area on axial T1-weighted enhanced MR images. Then, 4 pretrained neural networks for prediction of residual tumors were trained with CCRT and IC + CCRT datasets, and the performances of the models trained using each image and each patient as a unit were evaluated. Patients in the test cohort of CCRT and IC + CCRT datasets were successively classified by the trained CCRT and IC + CCRT models. Model recommendations were formed according to the classification and compared with the treatment decisions of physicians. Results: The Dice coefficient of Deeplabv3 (0.752) was higher than that of U-net (0.689). The average area under the curve (aAUC) of the 4 networks was 0.728 for the CCRT and 0.828 for the IC + CCRT models trained using a single image as a unit, whereas the aAUC for models trained using each patient as a unit was 0.928 for the CCRT and 0.915 for the IC + CCRT models, respectively. The accuracy of the model recommendation and the decision of physicians was 84.06% and 60.00%, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed method can effectively predict the residual tumor status of patients after CCRT and IC + CCRT. Recommendations based on the model prediction results can protect some patients from receiving additional IC and improve the survival rate of patients with NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.