Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284048›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

New-onset Chronic Kidney Disease After Surgery for Localised Renal Masses in Patients with Two Kidneys and Preserved Renal Function: A Contemporary Multicentre Study.

Alessio Pecoraro, Eduard Roussel, Daniele Amparore, Andrea Mari, Antonio Andrea Grosso, Enrico Checcucci, Francesco Montorsi, Alessandro Larcher, Hendrik Van Poppel, Francesco Porpiglia and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Management of Small Renal Masses <2 cm: Treatment.European urology open science · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessio PecoraroUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Eduard RousselDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniele AmparoreYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Andrea MariUnit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Antonio Andrea GrossoUnit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Enrico CheccucciDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro LarcherDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Hendrik Van PoppelDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Francesco PorpigliaDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Umberto CapitanioDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Andrea MinerviniUnit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Maarten AlbersenDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sergio SerniUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo CampiUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Turin · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of evidence on acute kidney injury (AKI) and new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) after surgery for localised renal masses (LRMs) in patients with two kidneys and preserved baseline renal function. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and risk of AKI and new-onset clinically significant CKD (csCKD) in patients with a single renal mass and preserved renal function after being treated with partial (PN) or radical (RN) nephrectomy. Design setting and participants: We queried our prospectively maintained databases to identify patients with a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m Intervention: PN or RN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The outcomes of this study were AKI at hospital discharge and the risk of new-onset csCKD, defined as eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m Results and limitations: Overall, 2469/3076 (80%) patients met the inclusion criteria. At hospital discharge, 371/2469 (15%) developed AKI (8.7% vs 14% vs 31% in patients with low- vs intermediate- vs high-complexity tumours, Conclusions: The risk of AKI and de novo csCKD in elective patients with an LRM and preserved baseline renal function is not clinically negligible, especially in those with higher-complexity tumours. While baseline nonmodifiable patient/tumour-related characteristics modulate this risk, PN should be prioritised over RN to maximise nephron preservation if oncological outcomes are not jeopardised. Patient summary: In this study, we evaluated how many patients with a localised renal mass and two functioning kidneys, who were candidates for surgery at four referral European centres, experienced acute kidney injury at hospital discharge and significant renal functional impairment during the follow-up. We found that the risk of acute kidney injury and clinically significant chronic kidney disease in this patient population is not negligible, and was associated with specific baseline patient comorbidities, preoperative renal function, tumour anatomical complexity, and surgery-related factors, in particular the performance of radical nephrectomy.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryChronic kidney diseasePartial nephrectomyRadical nephrectomyRenal cell carcinomaRenal mass

Identifiers

PMID37284048
PMCPMC10240519
OpenAlexW4372330013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.