ArticleEuropean urology open science2023
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Vasoepididymal Anastomosis for Idiopathic Obstructive Azoospermia: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Men with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia (OA) are candidates for surgical reconstruction with a vasoepididymal anastomosis (VEA) performed on one or both testis. There are no randomised trials comparing the success of unilateral versus bilateral VEA. Objective: We conducted a randomised trial to compare the two surgical options. Design setting and participants: Between April 2017 and March 2022, men with infertility due to idiopathic OA were randomised to a unilateral (group 1) or bilateral (group 2) VEA in an ethics committee-approved clinical trial, registered with the Clinical Trials Registry. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was successful surgery, defined as appearance of sperm in the ejaculate, evaluated at 3 mo intervals after surgery. Additional outcomes were pregnancy rates and complications between the two groups. Men with successful surgery were compared with those without patency to identify the predictors of success. Results and limitations: Fifty-four men fulfilled the criteria and 52 who completed follow-up were included in the analysis. The overall patency rate was 36.5% (19/52 individuals). This was higher in men with bilateral surgery (12/26 patients, 46%) than in those with unilateral surgery (7/26 patients, 27%) but was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: A bilateral VEA was associated with higher patency and spontaneous pregnancy rates than unilateral surgery, but the results were not statistically significant. However, the overall pregnancy rate with ejaculated sperm, spontaneous and assisted, was significantly higher in the bilateral surgery group. Patient summary: In this study, we compared between unilateral and bilateral reconstructive surgery in azoospermic men and found better overall success with bilateral surgery. However, these results were not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.