Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284041›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Improving Outcomes of Same-sitting Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones in Real-world Practice-Lessons Learnt from Global Multicenter Experience of 1250 Patients.

Daniele Castellani, Olivier Traxer, Deepak Ragoori, Andrea Benedetto Galosi, Virgilio De Stefano, Nariman Gadzhiev, Yiloren Tanidir, Takaaki Inoue, Esteban Emiliani, Saeed Bin Hamri and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Deepak RagooriDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology & Urology, Irram Manzil Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Andrea Benedetto GalosiUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Virgilio De StefanoUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Nariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Yiloren TanidirDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Takaaki InoueDepartment of Urology, Hara Genitourinary Private Hospital, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Esteban EmilianiDepartment of Urology, Fundacion Puigvert, Autónomos University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Saeed Bin HamriDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ministry of the National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Amine LakmichiDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Mohammed the VIth of Marrakesh, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Chandra Mohan VaddiDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Chin Tiong HengDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Boyke SoebhaliDepartment of Urology, Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital, Medical Faculty Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Sumit MoreDepartment of Urology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Centre, Faridabad, India.
Vikram SridharanDepartment of Urology, Sree Paduka Speciality Hospital, Thillai Nagar, India.
Mehmet Ilker GökceDepartment of Urology, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Azimdjon N TursunkulovUrology Division, AkfaMedline Hospital, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Arvind GanpuleDepartment of Urology, Muļjibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Giacomo Maria PirolaUrology Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.
Angelo NaselliUrology Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, Italy.
Cemil AydinDepartment of Urology, Hitit University, School of Medicine, Çorum, Turkey.
Fernando Ramón de Fata ChillónDepartment of Urology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Catalina Solano MendozaDepartment of Urology AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Luigi CandelaDepartment of Urology AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Ben Hall ChewDepartment of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bilateral kidney stones are commonly treated in staged procedures. Objective: To evaluate outcomes after same-sitting bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (SSB-RIRS) for renal stones. Design setting and participants: Data from adults who underwent bilateral RIRS in 21 centers were retrospectively reviewed (from January 2015 to June 2022). The inclusion criteria were unilateral/bilateral symptomatic bilateral stone(s) of any size/location in both kidneys and bilateral stones on follow-up with symptom/stone progression. Stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as absence of any fragment >3 mm at 3 mo. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Continuous variables are presented as medians and 25-75th percentiles. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent predictors of sepsis and bilateral SFR. Results and limitations: A total of 1250 patients were included. The median age was 48.0 (36-61) yr. Of the patients, 58.2% were prestented. The median stone diameter was 10 mm on both sides. Multiple stones were present in 45.3% and 47.9% of the left and right kidneys, respectively. Surgery was stopped in 6.8% of cases. The median surgical time was 75.0 (55-90) min. Complications were transient fever (10.7%), fever/infection needing prolonged stay (5.5%), sepsis (2%), and blood transfusion (1.3%). Bilateral and unilateral SFRs were 73.0% and 17.4%, respectively. Female (odds ratio [OR] 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-7.49, Conclusions: SSB-RIRS is an effective treatment with an acceptable complication rate in selected patients with kidney stones. Patient summary: In this large multicenter study, we looked at outcomes after same-sitting bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (SSB-RIRS) for renal stones in a large cohort. We found that SSB-RIRS was associated with acceptable morbidity and good stone clearance after a single session.

Indexed as

Flexible ureteroscopyHolmium laserKidney calculiLaserLithotripsyRetrograde intrarenal surgeryThulium fiber laser

Identifiers

PMID37284041
PMCPMC10240508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.