Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37284026›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2022

PET Image Denoising using a Deep-Learning Method for Extremely Obese Patients.

Hui Liu, Hamed Yousefi, Niloufar Mirian, MingDe Lin, David Menard, Matthew Gregory, Mariam Aboian, Annemarie Boustani, Ming-Kai Chen, Lawrence Saperstein and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scatter correction for self-collimating SPECT using a 3D U-Net framework.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep Learning Denoising Improves and Homogenizes Patient [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hui LiuDepartment of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, and Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging, Ministry of Education (Tsinghua University), Beijing, China, on leave from the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Hamed YousefiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Niloufar MirianDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
MingDe LinDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
David MenardDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Matthew GregoryDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Mariam AboianDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Annemarie BoustaniDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ming-Kai ChenDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Lawrence SapersteinDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Darko PucarDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michal KulonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Chi LiuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Quantitative Low-Dose PET ImagingR01EB025468 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARSON, RICHARD E., LIU, CHI · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The image quality in clinical PET scan can be severely degraded due to high noise levels in extremely obese patients. Our work aimed to reduce the noise in clinical PET images of extremely obese subjects to the noise level of lean subject images, to ensure consistent imaging quality. The noise level was measured by normalized standard deviation (NSTD) derived from a liver region of interest. A deep learning-based noise reduction method with a fully 3D patch-based U-Net was used. Two U-Nets, U-Nets A and B, were trained on datasets with 40% and 10% count levels derived from 100 lean subjects, respectively. The clinical PET images of 10 extremely obese subjects were denoised using the two U-Nets. The results showed the noise levels of the images with 40% counts of lean subjects were consistent with those of the extremely obese subjects. U-Net A effectively reduced the noise in the images of the extremely obese patients while preserving the fine structures. The liver NSTD improved from 0.13±0.04 to 0.08±0.03 after noise reduction (

Indexed as

deep learningextremely obese patientFDG PETnoise reduction

Identifiers

PMID37284026
PMCPMC10241407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.