Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283985›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Factors that influence a patient's decision to engage in genetic research.

Amal Almutairi, Fatimah Abdulrahman Alqubaishi, Ebtehal A Alsolm, Albandari Binowayn, Rania Almohammad, Tariq Wani, Aljohara Ababtain, Udai Alkadi, May M Alrashed, Malak Althagafi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amal AlmutairiKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah Abdulrahman AlqubaishiKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ebtehal A AlsolmGenomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Albandari BinowaynKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rania AlmohammadGenomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq WaniResearch Services, Department of Biostatistics, Research Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aljohara AbabtainGenomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Udai AlkadiGenomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
May M AlrashedDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Malak AlthagafiGenomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Leen Abu-SafiehBioinformatics and Computational Biology Department, Research Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The most challenging step in clinical research studies is patient recruitment. Many research studies do not reach their targets because of participant rejection. The purpose of this study was to assess patient as well as the community knowledge, motivation, and barriers to participate in genetic research. Methods: A cross-section study was conducted between September 2018 and February 2020 using face-to-face interviews with candidate patients from outpatient clinics at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Additionally, an online survey was conducted to assess the community's knowledge, motivation and barriers to participate in genetic research studies. Results: In total, 470 patients were interviewed for this study, with 341 being successfully recruited for the face to face interview, and the other patients being refused owing to time constraints. The majority percentage of the respondents were females. The respondents' mean age was 30, and 52.6% reported having a college degree. The survey results from 388 participants illustrated that around 90% of the participants, participated voluntarily due to a good understanding of genetics studies. The majority held positive attitudes toward being part of genetic research, which exceeded the reported motivation score of >75%. The survey indicated that >90% of individuals were willing to participate to acquire therapeutic benefits or to receive continued aftercare. However, 54.6% of survey participants were worried about the side effects and the risks involved in genetic testing. A higher proportion (71.4%) of respondents reported that lack of knowledge about genetic research was one of the barriers to rejecting participation. Conclusion: Respondents reported relatively high motivation and knowledge for participation in genetic research. However, study participants reported "do not know enough about genetic research" and "lack of time during clinic visit" as a barrier for participation in genetic research.

Indexed as

Genetic ResearchMotivationCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesattitudeconcernsgenetic researchparticipationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID37283985
PMCPMC10239877
OpenAlexW4377291595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.