Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283962›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

Safety and immunogenicity of a skin- and neuro-attenuated live vaccine for varicella: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, dose-escalation and age de-escalation phase 1 clinical trial.

Zhao-Jun Mo, Shou-Jie Huang, Ling-Xian Qiu, Chang-Gui Li, Xiao-Juan Yu, Ming-Qiang Li, Zhen Chen, Guo-Hua Zhong, De-Quan Pan, Li-Rong Huang and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhao-Jun MoGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Shou-Jie HuangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Ling-Xian QiuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Chang-Gui LiNational Institute for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Juan YuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Ming-Qiang LiLiuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Zhen ChenNational Institute for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Guo-Hua ZhongState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
De-Quan PanState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Li-Rong HuangGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Bang-Jun LvLiuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Xue-Lian CuiLiuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Qiao-Qiao SongBeijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise CO., LTD., Beijing, China.
Ji-Zong JiaBeijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise CO., LTD., Beijing, China.
Jin-Le HanBeijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise CO., LTD., Beijing, China.
Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Hua ZhuDepartment of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, USA.
Tong ChengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Ying-Ying SuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yi-Min LiBeijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise CO., LTD., Beijing, China.
Xiang-Zhong YeBeijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise CO., LTD., Beijing, China.
Ting WuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Ning-Shao XiaState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xiamen University · CNBeijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy (China) · CNLiu Zhou Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNGuangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the success in decreasing varicella-related disease burden, live-attenuated Oka vaccine strain of varicella-zoster virus (vOka) remains neuro-virulence and may establish latency and reactivate, raising safety concerns. Here we aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a skin- and neuro-attenuated varicella vaccine candidate (v7D). Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation and age de-escalation phase 1 clinical trial conducted in Liuzhou, China (ChiCTR1900022284). Eligible healthy participants aged 1-49 years, with no history of varicella vaccination and had no history of varicella or herpes zoster were sequentially enrolled and allocated to subcutaneously receive one of the three doses (3.3, 3.9, and 4.2 lg PFU) of v7D, vOka or placebo in a dose-escalation and age de-escalation manner. The primary outcome was safety, assessed by adverse events/reactions within 42 days after vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout six months after vaccination. The secondary outcome was immunogenicity, assessed by the VZV IgG antibodies measured with fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen (FAMA) assay. Findings: Between April 2019 and March 2020, totally 224 participants were enrolled. Within 42 days post-vaccination, the incidences of adverse reactions were 37.5%-38.7% in the three doses of v7D groups which were similar to that of the vOka (37.5%) and placebo (34.4%) groups. No SAE has been judged as causally related to vaccination. At 42 days post-vaccination, 100% of children aged 1-12 years in the per-protocol set of immunogenicity cohort of the v7D groups became seropositive. Meanwhile, in the intent-to-treat set of immunogenicity cohort of subjects aged 1-49 years, the geometric mean increases of the three groups of v7D vaccine were 3.8, 5.8 and 3.2, respectively, which were similar to that of the vOka vaccine group (4.4) and significantly higher than that of the placebo group (1.3). Interpretation: The candidate v7D vaccine has been preliminarily shown to be well-tolerated and immunogenic in humans. The data warrant further evaluation of the safety advantage and efficacy of v7D as a varicella vaccine. Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and Beijing Wantai CO., LTD.

Indexed as

ImmunogenicityNeuro-attenuatedSafetySkin-attenuatedv7DVaccineVaricella-zoster virus

Identifiers

PMID37283962
PMCPMC10240365
OpenAlexW4321376610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.