Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283902›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Integrating robotics into wildlife conservation: testing improvements to predator deterrents through movement.

Stewart W Breck, Jeffrey T Schultz, David Prause, Cameron Krebs, Anthony J Giordano, Byron Boots

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stewart W BreckUSDA-WS-National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Jeffrey T SchultzUSDA-WS-National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
David PrauseCenter for Human-Carnivore Coexistence, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Cameron KrebsKrebs Livestock, Ione, Oregon, United States.
Anthony J GiordanoCenter for Human-Carnivore Coexistence, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States.
Byron BootsPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Agricultural and pastoral landscapes can provide important habitat for wildlife conservation, but sharing these landscapes with wildlife can create conflict that is costly and requires managing. Livestock predation is a good example of the challenges involving coexistence with wildlife across shared landscapes. Integrating new technology into agricultural practices could help minimize human-wildlife conflict. In this study, we used concepts from the fields of robotics ( Methods: We used a colony of captive coyotes as a model system, and simulated predation events with meat baits inside and outside of protected zones. Inside the protected zones we used a remote-controlled vehicle with a state-of-the art, commercially available predator deterrent ( Results: Survival of baits was consistently higher inside the protected zone, and the three movement treatments incrementally increased survival time over baseline except for the light only treatment in the nonprotected zone. Incorporating predetermined movement essentially doubled the efficacy of the light only treatment both inside and outside the protected zone. Incorporating adaptive movement exponentially increased survival time both inside and outside the protected zone. Our findings provide compelling evidence that incorporating existing robotics capabilities (predetermined and adaptive movement) could greatly enhance protection of agricultural resources and aid in the development of nonlethal tools for managing wildlife. Our findings also demonstrate the importance of marrying agricultural practices (

Indexed as

Animals, WildCoyotesAgricultureAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansLivestockAdaptive deterrentAutomated vehiclesCarnivoreCoexistenceConservation technologyDepredation managementHuman-wildlife conflictLivestock distributionMovementRobotics

Identifiers

PMID37283902
PMCPMC10239614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.