Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283853›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2023

Telehealth Clinical Appropriateness and Quality.

Lulu Wang, Anthony Fabiano, Arjun K Venkatesh, Nick Patel, Judd E Hollander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Use and Perception of Video Consultations Among Swedish Dietitians Before and After COVID-19 Onset.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lulu WangMedStar Health, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-6108
Anthony FabianoUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Arjun K VenkateshYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nick PatelUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Judd E HollanderSidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrary to common perception, telehealth is not simply a substitute for in-person care. With an array of modalities-live audio-video, asynchronous patient communication, and remote patient monitoring, to name a few-telehealth creates entirely new avenues of care delivery (Table 1). Although our current care model is reactive-relying on episodic visits to an office or hospital-telehealth allows us to be proactive, filling in the gaps to provide a continuum of care. Widespread uptake of telehealth has created fertile ground for long-overdue health system reform. In this study, we describe essential next steps: redefine telehealth clinical appropriateness, evolve payment models, provide necessary training, and reimagine the patient-physician interaction.

Indexed as

clinical appropriatenesstelehealthtelehealth qualitytelehealth trainingvirtual examination

Identifiers

PMID37283853
PMCPMC10240320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.