Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283776›Full record

ArticleKansas journal of medicine2023

Disparities in Referral Initiation and Completion at an Urban FQHC Look-alike (FQHC-LA) Clinic.

Amanda K Emerson, Dorothy Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kansas journal of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda K EmersonUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS.
Dorothy HughesUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine-Salina, Salina, KS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine referral initiation and completion disparities across primary care encounters at the Hope Family Care Center (HFCC) in Kansas City, MO, by payor type (primary insurance): private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Methods: Data were collected and analyzed for all encounters (N = 4,235) over a 15-month period, including payor type, referral initiation and completion, and demographics. Referral initiation and completion were calculated by payor type and differences analyzed using Chi-square tests and t-tests. Logistic regression examined payor type association with referral initiation and completion, accounting for demographic variables. Results: Our analysis showed a meaningful difference in rate of referral to specialists by payor type. The Medicaid encounter referral initiation rate was higher than rates for all other payor types (7.4% vs. 5.0%), and self-pay encounters' referral initiation rate was lower than rates for all other payor types (3.8% vs. 6.4%). Using logistic regression, Medicaid encounters had 1.4 greater odds, and self-pay encounters 0.7 greater odds, of initiating a referral compared to private insurance encounters. There was no difference in referral completion by payor type or demographic category. Conclusions: Equal referral completion rates across payor types suggested HFCC may have had well-established referral resources for patients. Higher referral initiation rates for Medicaid and lower for self-pay may suggest that insurance coverage offered financial confidence when seeking specialist care. Higher odds of Medicaid encounters initiating a referral could imply greater health needs among Medicaid patients.

Indexed as

continuity of patient careMedicaidmedically uninsuredreferral and consultationsafety-net providers

Identifiers

PMID37283776
PMCPMC10241200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.