ArticleInternational journal of human-computer studies2023
Competitive gamification in crowdsourcing-based contextual-aware recommender systems.
Article in International journal of human-computer studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the COVID-19 outbreak, crowdsourcing-based context-aware recommender systems (CARS) which capture the real-time context in a contactless manner played an important role in the "new normal". This study investigates whether this approach effectively supports users' decisions during epidemics and how different game designs affect users performing crowdsourcing tasks. This study developed a crowdsourcing-based CARS focusing on restaurant recommendations. We used four conditions (control, self-competitive, social-competitive, and mixed gamification) and conducted a two-week field study involving 68 users. The system provided recommendations based on real-time contexts including restaurants' epidemic status, allowing users to identify suitable restaurants to visit during COVID-19. The result demonstrates the feasibility of crowdsourcing to collect real-time information for recommendations during COVID-19 and reveals that a mixed competitive game design encourages both high- and low-performance users to engage more and that a game design with self-competitive elements motivates users to take on a wider variety of tasks. These findings inform the design of restaurant recommender systems in an epidemic context and serve as a comparison of incentive mechanisms for gamification of self-competition and competition with others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.