Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283581›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Aortic haemodynamics and wall stress analysis following arch aneurysm repair using a single-branched endograft.

Sampad Sengupta, Xun Yuan, Ludovica Maga, Selene Pirola, Christoph A Nienaber, Xiao Yun Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Present and Future of Zone 0 Endovascular Arch Reconstruction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sampad SenguptaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Xun YuanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ludovica MagaDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Selene PirolaDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Christoph A NienaberNational Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Xiao Yun XuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBDelft University of Technology · NLPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of the arch is challenging given its complex geometry and the involvement of supra-aortic arteries. Different branched endografts have been designed for use in this region, but their haemodynamic performance and the risk for post-intervention complications are not yet clear. This study aims to examine aortic haemodynamics and biomechanical conditions following TVAR treatment of an aortic arch aneurysm with a two-component single-branched endograft. Methods: Computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis were applied to a patient-specific case at different stages: pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up. Physiologically accurate boundary conditions were used based on available clinical information. Results: Computational results obtained from the post-intervention model confirmed technical success of the procedure in restoring normal flow to the arch. Simulations of the follow-up model, where boundary conditions were modified to reflect change in supra-aortic vessel perfusion observed on the follow-up scan, predicted normal flow patterns but high levels of wall stress (up to 1.3M MPa) and increased displacement forces in regions at risk of compromising device stability. This might have contributed to the suspected endoleaks or device migration identified at the final follow up. Discussion: Our study demonstrated that detailed haemodynamic and biomechanical analysis can help identify possible causes for post-TEVAR complications in a patient-specific setting. Further refinement and validation of the computational workflow will allow personalised assessment to aid in surgical planning and clinical decision making.

Indexed as

aortic archcomputational fluid dynamicsendograftfinite element analysisTEVAR

Identifiers

PMID37283581
PMCPMC10240084
OpenAlexW4377287984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.