Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283574›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Trends in surgical aortic valve replacement in pre- and post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement eras at a structural heart center.

Elizabeth L Norton, Alison F Ward, Andy Tully, Bradley G Leshnower, Robert A Guyton, Gaetano Paone, William B Keeling, Jeffrey S Miller, Michael E Halkos, Kendra J Grubb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth L NortonDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Alison F WardDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Andy TullyDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Bradley G LeshnowerDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Robert A GuytonDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Gaetano PaoneStructural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
William B KeelingDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jeffrey S MillerDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Michael E HalkosDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kendra J GrubbDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Valve (United States) · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has directly impacted the lifelong management of patients with aortic valve disease. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved TAVR for all surgical risk: prohibitive (2011), high (2012), intermediate (2016), and low (2019). Since then, TAVR volumes are increasing and surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVR) are decreasing. This study sought to evaluate trends in isolated SAVR in the pre- and post-TAVR eras. Methods: From January 2000 to June 2020, 3,861 isolated SAVRs were performed at a single academic quaternary care institution which participated in the early trials of TAVR beginning in 2007. A formal structural heart center was established in 2012 when TAVR became commercially available. Patients were divided into the pre-TAVR era (2000-2011, Results: The median age was 66 years, similar between groups. The post-TAVR group had a statistically higher rate of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, heart failure, more reoperative SAVR, and lower STS Predicted Risk of Mortality (PROM) (2.0% vs. 2.5%, Conclusion: The approval of TAVR changed the landscape of aortic valve disease management. At a quaternary academic cardiac surgery center with a well-established structural heart program, patients undergoing isolated SAVR in the post-TAVR era had lower STS PROM, more implantation of bioprosthetic valves, utilization of larger valves, annular enlargement, and lower in-hospital mortality. Isolated SAVR continues to be performed in the TAVR era with excellent outcomes. SAVR remains an essential tool in the lifetime management of aortic valve disease.

Indexed as

annular enlargementaortic insufficiency (AI)aortic stenosis (AS)aortic valvebioprosthetic aortic valveshort-term outcomessurgical aortic valve replacementtranscatheter aortic replacement

Identifiers

PMID37283574
PMCPMC10239805
OpenAlexW4377294915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.