Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283426›Full record

Trial reportDental press journal of orthodontics2023

Survival rate and stability of surface-treated and non-surface-treated orthodontic mini-implants: a randomized clinical trial.

Janani Ravi, Sangeetha Duraisamy, Krishnaraj Rajaram, Ravi Kannan, Edeinton Arumugam

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Bioinformation · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janani RaviSRM Dental College, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics (Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-3589
Sangeetha DuraisamySRM Dental College, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics (Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8563-0030
Krishnaraj RajaramSRM Dental College, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics (Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-2511
Ravi KannanSRM Dental College, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics (Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6412-4550
Edeinton ArumugamSRM Dental College, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics (Ramapuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-2969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the stability and failure rate of surface-treated orthodontic mini-implants and determine whether they differ from those of non-surface-treated orthodontic mini-implants. TRIAL

designRandomized clinical trial with a split-mouth study design.

settingDepartment of Orthodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai.

participantsPatients who required orthodontic mini-implants for anterior retraction in both arches.

methodsSelf-drilling, tapered, titanium orthodontic mini-implants with and without surface treatment were placed in each patient following a split-mouth design. The maximum insertion and removal torques were measured for each implant using a digital torque driver. The failure rates were calculated for each type of mini-implant.

resultsThe mean maximum insertion torque was 17.9 ± 5.6 Ncm for surface-treated mini-implants and 16.4 ± 9.0 Ncm for non-surface-treated mini-implants. The mean maximum removal torque was 8.1 ± 2.9 Ncm for surface-treated mini-implants and 3.3 ± 1.9 Ncm for non-surface-treated mini-implants. Among the failed implants, 71.4% were non-surface-treated mini-implants and 28.6% were surface-treated mini-implants.

conclusionThe insertion torque and failure rate did not differ significantly between the groups, whereas the removal torque was significantly higher in the surface-treated group. Thus, surface treatment using sandblasting and acid etching may improve the secondary stability of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.

trial registrationThe trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry, India (ICMR NIMS). Registration number: CTRI/2019/10/021718.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresOrthodonticsHumansIndiaOrthodontic Appliance DesignSurvival RateTorqueDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID37283426
PMCPMC10241510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.