ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2023
Chronic pain is no more prevalent in people living with HIV than in their uninfected counterparts in South Africa.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distress is positively associated with induced secondary hyperalgesia in people with suppressed HIV.The journal of pain · 2026Article
- Experiences and impact of chronic pain in South Africans living in a rural area: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Distress is positively associated with induced secondary hyperalgesia in people with suppressed HIV.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Chronic pain is no more prevalent in people living with HIV than in their uninfected counterparts in South Africa.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are few studies on chronic pain prevalence in people living with HIV, and there are no studies comparing chronic pain prevalence in an HIV-infected group (HIV+) to that found in an uninfected group (HIV-) in the same population. This study was undertaken to (1) estimate the chronic pain prevalence in HIV+ individuals and (2) compare chronic pain prevalence between HIV+ and HIV- groups in a population.
methodsIndividuals ≥15 years old were recruited using multi-stage probability sampling in the 2016 South African Demographic and Health Survey. In an interview, participants were asked whether they currently had pain or discomfort, and if so, whether that pain or discomfort had persisted for at least 3 months (operational definition of chronic pain). Blood samples were taken from a volunteering sub-sample for HIV testing.
resultsA total of 6584 of 12,717 eligible individuals answered the questionnaire and were tested for HIV. Mean age: 39.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.3-39.9), per cent female: 55% (95% CI: 52-56) and tested HIV+: 19% (95% CI: 17-20). The prevalence of chronic pain was 19% (95% CI: 16-23) in the HIV+ group, which was similar to that found in the HIV- group (20% [95% CI: 18-22]; odds ratio [adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic status] = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.74-1.17], p-value = 0.549).
conclusionThe prevalence of chronic pain in South Africans living with HIV was approximately 20%, and having HIV was not associated with an increased risk of chronic pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Using data from a large, national, population-based study in South Africa, I show for the first time that the prevalence of chronic pain in that population did not differ materially between the part of the population that was living with HIV compared with their uninfected counterparts (both approximately 20%). These findings run counter to the dogma that there is a greater risk of having pain in people living with HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.