Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37283195›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023

Cefotaxime/sulbactam plus gentamicin as a potential carbapenem- and amikacin-sparing first-line combination for neonatal sepsis in high ESBL prevalence settings.

J B Readman, M Acman, A Hamawandi, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, M Sharland, J A Lindsay, J F Standing

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of β-lactam antibiotics on the gut microbiota of term neonates.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J B ReadmanInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
M AcmanUCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, UK.
A HamawandiInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Cheng-Hsun ChiuChang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
M SharlandInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
J A LindsayInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
J F StandingInstitute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-7173
St George's, University of London · GBChang Gung University · TWUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M008665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infection is ubiquitous in some neonatal ICUs and increasing levels of antibiotic resistance are a cause for urgent concern. Delineation of bacterial and viral sepsis can be challenging, often leading to patients receiving empirical antibiotics without or whilst waiting for a definitive causal diagnosis. Empirical therapy is often dependent on broad-spectrum 'Watch' antibiotics, contributing to further resistance.

methodsESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates found to have caused neonatal sepsis and meningitis underwent a detailed in vitro screening including susceptibility testing, chequerboard combination analysis and hollow-fibre infection model dynamic analyses using combinations of cefotaxime, ampicillin and gentamicin in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors.

resultsAdditivity or synergy was found for all antibiotic combinations against seven Escherichia coli and three Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates. Cefotaxime or ampicillin plus sulbactam combined with gentamicin was able to consistently inhibit the growth of ESBL-producing isolates at typical neonatal doses, and the combination cleared the hollow-fibre infection model system of organisms resistant to each agent alone. The combination of cefotaxime/sulbactam and gentamicin was consistently bactericidal at clinically achievable concentrations (Cmax of 180, 60 and 20 mg/L for cefotaxime, sulbactam and gentamicin, respectively).

conclusionsThe addition of sulbactam to cefotaxime or ampicillin to the typical first-line empirical therapy could obviate the need for carbapenems and amikacin in settings with high ESBL-infection prevalence.

Indexed as

AmikacinNeonatal SepsisAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCefotaximeEscherichia coliGentamicinsHumansInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceSulbactamAmikacinAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCefotaximeGentamicinsSulbactamsultamicillin

Identifiers

PMID37283195
PMCPMC10393883
OpenAlexW4379599375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.