ArticleNucleic acids research2023
Mutational and structural analyses of UdgX: insights into the active site pocket architecture and its evolution.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- LuxS/AI-2 regulates phoP/phoQ by a non-canonical mechanism to enhance acid stress survival in Salmonella Typhimurium.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Structural and Functional Insights into UDGs.Protein and peptide letters · 2025Review
- Structural and functional coupling in cross-linking uracil-DNA glycosylase UDGX.Bioscience reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
UdgX excises uracil from uracil-containing DNA to concurrently form a covalent bond with the resulting AP-DNA. Structurally, UdgX is highly similar to family-4 UDGs (F4-UDGs). However, UdgX is unique in possessing a flexible R-loop (105KRRIH109). Among the class-defining motifs, while its motif A (51GEQPG55) diverged to possess Q53 in place of A53/G53 in F4-UDGs, motif B [178HPS(S/A)(L/V)(L/V)R184] has remained unchanged. Previously, we proposed an SN1 mechanism resulting in a covalent bond between H109 and AP-DNA. In this study, we investigated several single/double mutants of UdgX. The H109A, H109S, H109G, H109Q, H109C and H109K mutants gain conventional UDG activity to varying levels. The crystal structures of UdgX mutants show topological changes in their active sites, rationalizing their UDG activities. The E52Q, E52N and E52A mutants reveal that E52 forms a catalytic dyad with H109 to enhance its nucleophilicity. The Q53A mutant supports that UdgX specific evolution of Q53 occurred essentially to stabilize the R-loop conformation. The R184A mutation (motif B) supports the role of R184 in substrate-binding. Taken together, the structural, bioinformatics, and mutational studies suggest that UdgX diverged from F4-UDGs, and the emergence of the characteristic R-loop in UdgX is functionally assisted by A53/G53 to Q53 changes in motif A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.