Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37282753›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

'To be Informed and Involved': Women's insights on optimising childbirth care in Lithuania.

Giedrė Širvinskienė, Švitrigailė Grincevičienė, Rasa Pranskevičiūtė-Amoson, Milda Kukulskienė, Soo Downe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 'To be Informed and Involved': Women's insights on optimising childbirth care in Lithuania.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giedrė ŠirvinskienėDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-1858-0237
Švitrigailė GrincevičienėDepartment of Biothermodynamics and Drug Design, Institute of Biotechnology, Life Science Centre, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Rasa Pranskevičiūtė-AmosonInstitute of Asian and Transcultural Studies, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Milda KukulskienėDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Soo DowneReaCH Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancaster, Preston, UK.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTVilnius University · LTUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

EU COST Action IS0907EU COST Action IS1405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe user expectations and experiences of healthcare services are acknowledged as components of the quality of healthcare evaluations. The aim of the study is to analyse women's experiences and views on childbirth care in Lithuania.

methodsThe study used the Babies Born Better (B3) online survey as the data collection instrument. The B3 is an ongoing longitudinal international project, examining the experiences of intrapartum care and developed as part of EU-funded COST Actions (IS0907 and IS1405). Responses to open-ended questions about (1) the best things about the care and (2) things in childbirth care worth changing are included in the current analysis. The participants are 373 women who had given birth within 5 years in Lithuania. A deductive coding framework established by the literature review was used to analyse the qualitative data. The framework involves three main categories: (1) the service, (2) the emotional experience and (3) the individually experienced care, each further divided into subcategories.

resultsReflecting the experience and views regarding the service at birthplace women wished empowerment, support for their autonomy and to be actively involved in decisions, the need for privacy, information and counselling, especially about breastfeeding. In terms of emotional experience, women highlighted the importance of comprehensibility/feeling of safety, positive manageability of various situations and possibilities for bonding with the newborn. Individually experienced care was described by feedback on specific characteristics of care providers, such as competence, personality traits, time/availability and encouragement of esteem in women in childbirth. The possibilities of homebirth were also discussed. The findings reflected salutogenic principles. KEY

conclusionsThe findings suggest that the Lithuanian healthcare system is in a transition from paternalistic attitude-based practices to a shift towards patient-oriented care. Implementation of the improvements suggested for women in childbirth care in Lithuania would require some additional services, improved emotional and intrapersonal aspects of care and a more active role for women. PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and the public contributed to this study by spreading information about surveys and research findings through their involvement in service user groups that have an interest in maternity care. Members of the patients' groups and the public were involved in the discussion of the results.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesChildDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLithuaniaParturitionPerinatal CarePregnancyQualitative ResearchBabies Born Better surveychildbirthLithuaniamaternityqualitative researchwomen's experiences and views

Identifiers

PMID37282753
PMCPMC10349258
OpenAlexW4379598174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.