ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
Brain functional connectivity based on phase lag index of electroencephalography for automated diagnosis of schizophrenia using residual neural networks.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heartfulness Meditation-induced State and Trait Effects on Long-term, Short-term and Non-meditators Using Connectivity Analysis: An EEG Study on Prefrontal Cortex.Annals of neurosciences · 2026Article
- Configurable Modular EEG Classification Framework with Multiscale Features and Ensemble Learning: A Reproducible Evaluation for Schizophrenia Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ADHD detection from EEG signals using GCN based on multi-domain features.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Brain functional connectivity based on phase lag index of electroencephalography for automated diagnosis of schizophrenia using residual neural networks.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of symptoms of schizophrenia (SZ) complicate traditional and effective diagnoses based on clinical signs. Moreover, clinical diagnosis of SZ is manual, time-consuming, and error-prone. Thus, there is a requirement to develop automated systems for timely and accurate diagnosis of SZ. This paper proposes an automated SZ diagnosis pipeline based on residual neural networks (ResNet). To exploit the superior image processing capabilities of the ResNet models, multi-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were converted into functional connectivity representations (FCRs). The functional connectivity of multiple regions in the cerebral cortex is critical for a better understanding of the mechanisms of SZ. In creating the FCR input images, the phase lag index (PLI) was calculated based on 16-channel EEG signals from 45 SZ patients and 39 healthy control (HC) subjects to reduce and avoid the volume conduction effect. The experimental results showed that satisfactory classification performance (accuracy = 96.02%, specificity = 94.85%, sensitivity = 97.03%, precision = 95.70%, and F1-score = 96.33%) was achieved by combining FCR inputs of beta oscillatory and the ResNet-50 model. The statistical analyses also confirmed that there is a significant difference between SZ patients and HC subjects (p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA). More specifically, the average connectivity strengths between nodes in the parietal cortex and those in the central, occipital, and temporal regions were significantly reduced in SZ patients compared to HC subjects. Overall results demonstrated that this paper not only provided an automated diagnostic model whose classification performance is superior to most previous studies but also valuable biomarkers for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.