Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37282580›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Review on Deep Learning-Based CAD Systems for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

S Arun Kumar, S Sasikala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S Arun KumarElectronics and Communication Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8872-6073
S SasikalaElectronics and Communication Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-6635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast Cancer (BC) is a major health issue in women of the age group above 45. Identification of BC at an earlier stage is important to reduce the mortality rate. Image-based noninvasive methods are used for early detection and for providing appropriate treatment. Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) schemes can support radiologists in making correct decisions. Computational intelligence paradigms such as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) have been used in the recent past in CAD systems to accelerate diagnosis. ML techniques are feature driven and require a high amount of domain expertise. However, DL approaches make decisions directly from the image. The current advancement in DL approaches for early diagnosis of BC is the motivation behind this review. This article throws light on various types of CAD approaches used in BC detection and diagnosis. A survey on DL, Transfer Learning, and DL-based CAD approaches for the diagnosis of BC is presented in detail. A comparative study on techniques, datasets, and performance metrics used in state-of-the-art literature in BC diagnosis is also summarized. The proposed work provides a review of recent advancements in DL techniques for enhancing BC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMammographyartificial intelligencebreast cancercomputer-aided diagnosisdeep learningdetectiontransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37282580
PMCPMC10272643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.