ArticleNeural regeneration research2023
Do astrocytes respond to light, sound, or electrical stimulation?
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Astrocytes are not only the most populous cell type in the human brain, but they also have the most extensive and diverse sets of connections, across synapses, axons, blood vessels, as well as having their own internal network. Unsurprisingly, they are associated with many brain functions; from the synaptic transmission to energy metabolism and fluid homeostasis, and from cerebral blood flow and blood-brain barrier maintenance to neuroprotection, memory, immune defenses and detoxification, sleep, and early development. And yet, notwithstanding these key roles, so many current therapeutic approaches to a range of brain disorders have largely neglected their potential involvement. In this review, we consider the role of astrocytes in three brain therapies; two are emerging treatments (photobiomodulation and ultrasound), while the other is well-established (deep brain stimulation). In essence, we explore the issue of whether external sources, such as light, sound, or electricity, can influence the function of astrocytes, as they do neurons. We find that, when taken all together, each of these external sources can influence many, if not, all of the functions associated with astrocytes. These include influencing neuronal activity, prompting neuroprotection, reducing inflammation (astrogliosis) and potentially increasing cerebral blood flow and stimulating the glymphatic system. We suggest that astrocytes, just like neurons, can respond positively to each of these external applications and that their activation could each impart many beneficial outcomes on brain function; they are likely to be key players underpinning the mechanisms behind many therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.