Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37282419›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery

Complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A retrospective study of cases performed by a single surgeon.

Amruta Choudhary, Pandit A Palaskar, Vinod Bhivsane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amruta ChoudharyDepartment of OBGY, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Pandit A PalaskarDepartment of OBGY, Endoworld Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Vinod BhivsaneDepartment of OBGY, Endoworld Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hysterectomy is the most common gynaecological surgery and there are different techniques of performing hysterectomy. With the advent of laparoscopic technology, laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) is rapidly gaining its ground. However, every surgery has its complications which are specific but also depends on various factors such as surgical sk[ills and experience of surgeons, levels of operative laparoscopy and patient populations. Aims and Objective: In this study, we evaluated the complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and analysed the trend of complications, intraoperative and post-operative, over a period of time. Methods: It was a retrospective study conducted in the private care setting. All women who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from a 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2017, (15 years) were included in this study. A total of 3272 patients were operated during this period. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Results: Intraoperative complications that occurred during surgery during the study period were 3 cases (0.09%) had bladder injury, 3 cases (0.09%) had bowel injury, 1 case (0.03%) had internal iliac vessel bleeding and 1 case(0.03%) needed conversion to vaginal hysterectomy due to cautery failure and post operative complications were 90 cases (2.75%) had vault bleeding, 2 cases (0.06%) had intestinal obstruction, 5 cases (0.15%) had paralytic ileus, 1 case (0.03%) had vesicovaginal fistula, 1 case(0.03%) had ureterovaginal fistula and 1 case (0.03%) had peritonitis. Conclusions: TLH is a very effective, patient-friendly and safe technique in the hands of experienced surgeons giving good quality of life to patients postoperatively.

Indexed as

Hysterectomyintraoperative complicationslaparoscopypost-operative complications

Identifiers

PMID37282419
PMCPMC10695312
OpenAlexW4327804804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.