ArticleDevelopment, growth & differentiation1995
Spontaneous and sperm-induced activation of oocytes in LT/Sv strain mice.
Article in Development, growth & differentiation, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Suppression of chemically induced and spontaneous mouse oocyte activation by AMP-activated protein kinase.Biology of reproduction · 2013Article
- Role of AMPK throughout meiotic maturation in the mouse oocyte: evidence for promotion of polar body formation and suppression of premature activation.Molecular reproduction and development · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oocytes of LT/Sv strain mice are unique in that a high proportion of them (∼40% in this study) are ovulated before reaching metaphase of the second meiotic division (metaphase II). The remaining oocytes of LT/Sv mice are ovulated at metaphase II, as in other strains of mice. When recently ovulated oocytes were cultured in vitro for 11-12 h, those ovulated at metaphase II remained at this stage, whereas those ovulated at metaphase of the first meiotic division (metaphase I) commonly resumed meiosis during in vitro aging. These oocytes extrude the polar body and form a diploid pronucleus. This oocyte activation is not coupled with cortical granule exocytosis. The oocytes ovulated at metaphase II are fully capable of normal fertilization, whereas those ovulated at metaphase I are not. Approximately 50% of metaphase I oocytes penetrated by spermatozoa remain at this stage, and sperm nuclei frequently undergo premature chromosome condensation. Only 13% of spermpenetrated metaphase I oocytes formed a diploid female pronucleus and a haploid male pronucleus by 4 h after insemination. These results demonstrate that the two types of ovulated LT/Sv oocytes have different potentials to undergo either spontaneous or sperm-induced activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.