ArticleDevelopment, growth & differentiation1995
Transgenesis of newt with exogenous gene expression facilitated by satellite 2 repeats.
Article in Development, growth & differentiation, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive reference transcriptome resource for the Iberian ribbed newt Pleurodeles waltl, an emerging model for developmental and regeneration biology.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2019Article
- Expressing exogenous genes in newts by transgenesis.Nature protocols · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetiç transduction of newt was undertaken in search of conditions allowing high exogenous gene expression in stages from late embryo to larva when regeneration experiments, which are advantageous for this group of animals, are possible. DNA of a β-galactosidase-encoding gene miwZ was injected in the cytoplasm of fertilized eggs in different molecular forms, and its fate and gene expression were studied in individual embryos. When DNA was injected in a linear form, DNA concatemerized quickly and the majority of the exogenous sequences were localized in the nuclear fraction from early gastrula onwards. By contrast, when circular DNA was injected, the exogenous DNA sequence largely remained in the cytoplasmic fraction, and the entry of the sequence into the nuclear fraction was delayed to mid-gastrula stage. Reflecting these differences, β-galactosidase expression in an embryo occurred earlier and more efficiently by linear DNA injection. Whole mount staining for β-galactosidase activity in tail bud embryos showed only spotty staining with circular DNA injection while spreading staining was also observed with linear DNA, suggesting difference in clone sizes of expressing cells depending on the DNA form. Expression of β-galactosidase, however, became low in the hatching stage. To augment and stabilize β-galactosidase expression to this stage, repeats of satellite 2 sequence, which is a transcriptionally active middle repetitive sequence highly conserved among urodeles, were added to the DNA in a way to bracket the miwZ gene. Injection of this DNA in linear form resulted in one order of magnitude higher β-galactosidase expression compared to without satellite 2 in the neurula embryos, and in high and persistent expression in the hatching larvae, without significant increase in the copy number of the exogenous DNA. Satellite 2 sequence probably provided a genetic environment favorable for transcription of a gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.