ArticleDevelopment, growth & differentiation1996
Fate of the sea urchin egg receptor for sperm following fertilization.
Article in Development, growth & differentiation, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sea urchin egg receptor for sperm is a 350 kDa glycoprotein containing a large extracellular domain that contains the sperm binding site, a transmembrane domain and a short COOH- terminal intracellular domain. During oogenesis, the receptor protein is first detected in Golgi-associated vesicles and cortical granules. Not until the egg is mature does the receptor appear on the cell surface; at this stage the intact receptor is found in approximately equal quantities on the egg cell surface and in cortical granules. As a potentially unique type of receptor, we were interested in its fate following fertilization. Several techniques have revealed that, following sperm binding, the amount of receptor markedly decreases. Using western blot analysis as well as direct measurement of the receptor protein, it was found that the membrane-bound form of the receptor rapidly disappeared following sperm binding to the egg, with only 3% of the receptor remaining after 30 s. Analysis by immupoelectron microscopy revealed that 30 s after sperm binding, 30% of the initial level of receptor was present. This remaining 30% was found mostly within the perivitelline space formed by the raised fertilization envelope. The disparity between these two sets of results (i.e. 3 vs 30%) is most likely accounted for by the exocytosis of receptor molecules from cortical granules; this fraction of the receptor would have been lost during isolation of the membrane-bound form of the receptor. Thus, unlike other cell surface receptors, the sea urchin egg receptor for sperm is not endocytosed and recycled following ligand binding. Rather, it disappears, presumably as a result of proteolysis. Transiently, the cortical granule form of the receptor is found released into the perivitelline space where it may bind to sperm and thereby prevent polyspermy. Despite the apparent secretion of this form of the receptor, experiments with antibodies to the extracellular and intracellular domains indicate that the receptors in cortical granules and in the plasmic membrane are similar, if not identical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37281007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.