ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023
Quantitative measurement of finger usage in stroke hemiplegia using ring-shaped wearable devices.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- From Qualitative to Quantitative Functional Assessment in Stroke Rehabilitation with a Focus on Ultrasound Role.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The association of upper limb sensorimotor capacity, everyday inpatient behavior, and the effects of neurorehabilitation in persons with multiple sclerosis and stroke: a mixed-design study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Factors associated with upper extremity use after stroke: a scoping review of accelerometry studies.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Trends and Innovations in Wearable Technology for Motor Rehabilitation, Prediction, and Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn post-stroke rehabilitation, positive use of affected limbs in daily life is important to improve affected upper-limb function. Several studies have quantitatively evaluated the amount of upper-limb activity, but few have measured finger usage. In this study, we used a ring-shaped wearable device to measure upper-limb and finger usage simultaneously in hospitalized patients with hemiplegic stroke and investigated the association between finger usage and general clinical evaluation.
methodsTwenty patients with hemiplegic stroke in an inpatient hospital participated in this study. All patients wore a ring-shaped wearable device on both hands for 9 h on the day of the intervention, and their finger and upper-limb usage were recorded. For the rehabilitation outcome assessments, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Motor Activity Log-14 (MAL), and Functional Independence Measure Motor (FIM-m) were performed and evaluated on the same day as the intervention.
resultsFinger usage of the affected hand was moderately correlated with STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The finger-usage ratio was moderately correlated with FMA-UE ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The upper-limb usage of the affected side was moderately correlated with FMA-UE ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). The upper-limb usage ratio was moderately correlated with ARAT ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) and STEF ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), and strongly correlated with the STEF ratio ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). By contrast, there was no correlation between MAL and any of the measurements.
conclusionsThis measurement technique provided useful information that was not biased by the subjectivity of the patients and therapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.