Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37280648›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

Traditional supports and contemporary disrupters of high fertility desires in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Anna C Church, Mobolaji Ibitoye, Shibani Chettri, John B Casterline

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Determinants of children ever born among women in Somalia: a national survey study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna C ChurchDepartment of Sociology, The Ohio State University, 238 Townshend Hall, 1885 Neil Avenue Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. church.213@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3039-6096
Mobolaji IbitoyeInstitute for Population Research, The Ohio State University, 060 Townshend Hall, 1885 Neil Avenue Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4820-0805
Shibani ChettriCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 250 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-4714
John B CasterlineInstitute for Population Research, The Ohio State University, 060 Townshend Hall, 1885 Neil Avenue Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-9973

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-007809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe desired number of children is markedly higher in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) than in other major regions. Efforts to understand how and why these desires are generated and maintained have yielded a broad research literature. Yet there is no full picture of the range of contextual, cultural, and economic factors that support and disrupt high fertility desires.

objectiveThis scoping review synthesizes thirty years of research on the determinants of fertility desires in SSA to better understand what factors underlie men and women's stated fertility desires and how they weigh the costs and benefits of having (more) children.

methodWe identified and screened 9863 studies published from 1990 to 2021 from 18 social science, demographic, and health databases. We appraised determinants of fertility desires from 258 studies that met inclusion criteria according to their roles as traditional supports or contemporary disrupters of high fertility desires.

resultsWe identified 31 determinants of high fertility desires, which we organized into six overarching themes: economy and costs; marriage; the influence of others; education and status; health and mortality; and demographic predictors. For each theme, we summarize ways in which the determinants both support and disrupt high fertility desires. We find that high fertility remains desirable in many regions of sub-Saharan Africa but contemporary disrupters, such as the economic situations and increases to family planning and education, cause individuals to decrease their desired fertility with such decreases often viewed as a temporary adjustment to temporary conditions. Most included studies were quantitative, cross-sectional, and based on survey data.

conclusionThis review demonstrates how traditionally supportive and contemporary disruptive forces simultaneously influence fertility desires in sub-Saharan Africa. Future studies analyzing fertility desires in sub-Saharan Africa should be informed by the lived experiences of men and women in this region, with qualitative and longitudinal studies prioritized.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesFertilityAfrica South of the SaharaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMarriageSocioeconomic FactorsFertility desiresHigh fertilityMen and womenScoping reviewSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID37280648
PMCPMC10242605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.