SynthesisMalaria journal2023
Predicting the risk of malaria re-introduction in countries certified malaria-free: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imported malaria: a silent and forgotten threat in malaria free zones?Malaria journal · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping of the Global Importation Risk of Malaria to China - Global, 2024.China CDC weekly · 2026Article
- Resurgence of Malaria in Protected and Rural Areas After Successful Control Program in a Brazilian Amazon Municipality.GeoHealth · 2026Article
- The Impact of Climate Change on the Emergence and Reemergence of Diseases Transmitted by Mosquitoes in Temperate Regions: An Umbrella Review.Portuguese journal of public health · 2026Article
- Asymptomatic and submicroscopic Plasmodium vivax infection: a study previous to malaria-free certification in Argentina.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Building a tool to assess malaria surveillance and response capacity in malaria post-elimination contexts: a modified and dual-weighted Delphi approach.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- Vector-Borne Infections in Romania: From Surveillance to Prediction.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Contribution of Travelers toJMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- The Paradigm Shift of Using Natural Molecules Extracted from Northern Canada to Combat Malaria.Infectious disease reports · 2024Review
- Malaria in under-five children: prevalence and multi-factor analysis of high-risk African countries.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Malaria Tropica: An Autopsy Case Report With a Discussion on the Presence of Malaria in Bulgaria.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting the risk of malaria in countries certified malaria-free is crucial for the prevention of re-introduction. This review aimed to identify and describe existing prediction models for malaria re-introduction risk in eliminated settings.
methodsA systematic literature search following the PRISMA guidelines was carried out. Studies that developed or validated a malaria risk prediction model in eliminated settings were included. At least two authors independently extracted data using a pre-defined checklist developed by experts in the field. The risk of bias was assessed using both the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) and the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (aNOS).
resultsA total 10,075 references were screened and 10 articles describing 11 malaria re-introduction risk prediction models in 6 countries certified malaria free. Three-fifths of the included prediction models were developed for the European region. Identified parameters predicting malaria re-introduction risk included environmental and meteorological, vectorial, population migration, and surveillance and response related factors. Substantial heterogeneity in predictors was observed among the models. All studies were rated at a high risk of bias by PROBAST, mostly because of a lack of internal and external validation of the models. Some studies were rated at a low risk of bias by the aNOS scale.
conclusionsMalaria re-introduction risk remains substantial in many countries that have eliminated malaria. Multiple factors were identified which could predict malaria risk in eliminated settings. Although the population movement is well acknowledged as a risk factor associated with the malaria re-introduction risk in eliminated settings, it is not frequently incorporated in the risk prediction models. This review indicated that the proposed models were generally poorly validated. Therefore, future emphasis should be first placed on the validation of existing models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.