Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37280626›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2023

Predicting the risk of malaria re-introduction in countries certified malaria-free: a systematic review.

Guangyu Lu, Dongying Zhang, Juan Chen, Yuanyuan Cao, Liying Chai, Kaixuan Liu, Zeying Chong, Yuying Zhang, Yan Lu, Anna-Katharina Heuschen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Contribution of Travelers toJMIR public health and surveillance · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guangyu Lu *School of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225007, China. guangyu.lu@yzu.edu.cn.
Dongying Zhang *Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Juan Chen *School of Nursing, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Yuanyuan CaoNational Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory On Parasite and Vector Control Technology, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Wuxi, China.
Liying ChaiSchool of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225007, China.
Kaixuan LiuSchool of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225007, China.
Zeying ChongSchool of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225007, China.
Yuying ZhangSchool of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225007, China.
Yan LuNanjing Health and Customs Quarantine Office, Nanjing, China.
Anna-Katharina HeuschenInstitute of Global Health, Medical School, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Olaf MüllerInstitute of Global Health, Medical School, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Guoding ZhuCenter for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. jipdzhu@hotmail.com.
Jun CaoCenter for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. caojuncn@hotmail.com.
Yangzhou University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNHeidelberg University · DEJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases · CNNanjing Health and Health Commission · CN

Funding

International Research Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonotic Diseases of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions 01Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis R2208National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention and Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology wk023-007National Natural Science Foundation of China 71904165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the risk of malaria in countries certified malaria-free is crucial for the prevention of re-introduction. This review aimed to identify and describe existing prediction models for malaria re-introduction risk in eliminated settings.

methodsA systematic literature search following the PRISMA guidelines was carried out. Studies that developed or validated a malaria risk prediction model in eliminated settings were included. At least two authors independently extracted data using a pre-defined checklist developed by experts in the field. The risk of bias was assessed using both the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) and the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (aNOS).

resultsA total 10,075 references were screened and 10 articles describing 11 malaria re-introduction risk prediction models in 6 countries certified malaria free. Three-fifths of the included prediction models were developed for the European region. Identified parameters predicting malaria re-introduction risk included environmental and meteorological, vectorial, population migration, and surveillance and response related factors. Substantial heterogeneity in predictors was observed among the models. All studies were rated at a high risk of bias by PROBAST, mostly because of a lack of internal and external validation of the models. Some studies were rated at a low risk of bias by the aNOS scale.

conclusionsMalaria re-introduction risk remains substantial in many countries that have eliminated malaria. Multiple factors were identified which could predict malaria risk in eliminated settings. Although the population movement is well acknowledged as a risk factor associated with the malaria re-introduction risk in eliminated settings, it is not frequently incorporated in the risk prediction models. This review indicated that the proposed models were generally poorly validated. Therefore, future emphasis should be first placed on the validation of existing models.

Indexed as

MalariaHumansPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsMalaria eliminationPrediction modelsRe-introduction riskSurveillanceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37280626
PMCPMC10243267
OpenAlexW4379538140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.