Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37280440›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Optimisation of risk and crisis communication of governments, authorities and public health institutions-challenges in long-lasting crises illustrated by the COVID-19 pandemic].

Annett Schulze, Fabian Brand, Dinah Kristin Leschzyk, Michael Beuthner, Alena Biegert, Udo Bomnüter, Bettina Boy, Hans-Jürgen Bucher, Robert Frau, Marvin Hubig and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Annett SchulzeAbteilung Risikokommunikation, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Deutschland. annett.schulze@bfr.bund.de.
Fabian BrandAbteilung Risikokommunikation, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Deutschland.
Dinah Kristin LeschzykAbteilung Risikokommunikation, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Deutschland.
Michael BeuthnerSRH Berlin School of Applied Sciences, Berlin School of Popular Arts, Berlin, Deutschland.
Alena BiegertAbteilung Risikokommunikation, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Deutschland.
Udo BomnüterMacromedia University of Applied Sciences, Campus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Bettina BoyKarlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
Hans-Jürgen BucherKarlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
Robert FrauEuropa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Deutschland.
Marvin HubigEuropa-Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Deutschland.
Martin LöffelholzTechnische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Deutschland.
Johanne MayerKarlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
Carolyn PliquetSRH Berlin School of Applied Sciences, Berlin School of Popular Arts, Berlin, Deutschland.
Johanna RadechovskyTechnische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Deutschland.
Kathrin SchleicherTechnische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Deutschland.
Kirsten UlbrichSRH Berlin School of Applied Sciences, Berlin School of Popular Arts, Berlin, Deutschland.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DETechnische Universität Ilmenau · DEEuropean University Viadrina · DEHochschule Macromedia · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates the great importance of risk and crisis communication. In a dynamic situation, authorities and policymakers face the challenge of dealing with a large amount of data, reviewing it and communicating it in a way that is appropriate for diverse target groups. Comprehensible and unambiguous information on risks and options for action make a significant contribution to the objective and subjective safety of the population. Hence, there is a great need to use the experience gained from the pandemic to optimize risk and crisis communication.Digitalization enables multimodal arrangements - that is, the combination of text, graphics, icons, images, animations and sound. These arrangements play an increasingly important role in risk and crisis communication. It is of interest to what extent the communicative interaction of authorities, media and other public actors in crisis preparation and management in view of a complex public can be improved with the help of target group-specific communication and how legal certainty can be ensured for official and media practice. Accordingly, the article pursues three objectives:1. It describes the challenges faced by authorities and media actors in pandemic communication.2. It shows the role of multimodal arrangements as well as the necessary research perspectives to grasp the complexity of communicative crisis management in the federal system.3. It provides a rationale for how an interdisciplinary research network from the fields of media, communication and law can gain insights into the evidence-based use of multimodal communication.

Indexed as

COVID-19CommunicationGermanyGovernmentHumansPandemicsPublic HealthCrisis dispositiveData visualizationDisinformationLegal certaintyMultimodality

Identifiers

PMID37280440
PMCPMC10243687
OpenAlexW4379599578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.