Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37280437›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Return to sports following discectomy: does a consensus exist?

Henrik C Bäcker, Michael A Johnson, Jack Hanlon, Patrick Chan, Peter Turner, John Cunningham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. [Sport after disc herniation].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrik C BäckerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050, Melbourne, Australia. Henrik.baecker@sports-med.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4265-477X
Michael A JohnsonNeurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth Richmond, Richmond, Melbourne, Australia.
Jack HanlonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Grafton, New Zealand.
Patrick ChanNeurosciences Clinical Institute, Epworth Richmond, Richmond, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter TurnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050, Melbourne, Australia.
John CunninghamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville VIC 3050, Melbourne, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUEpworth Hospital · AUAuckland City Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the USA, lumbar discectomy is one of the most commonly performed spinal procedures. As certain sports are considered to be major risk factors for disc herniation, the question remains as to when highly active patients should return to their previous level of activity. This study aimed to analyze spine surgeons' opinions on when patients may return to activities following discectomy as well as their underlying rationale for their decision.

methodsA questionnaire was designed by five different fellowship-trained spine surgeons for the 168 members of the Spine Society of Australia. Questions on the surgeons experience, decision making, preferred surgical technique, the postoperative rehabilitation and the response to patient expectations were included.

resultsIn total, 83.9% of surgeons discuss the postoperative level of activity with their patients. Sport is considered as an important contributor for good functional outcome by 71.0% of surgeons. Surgeons recommend avoiding, often permanently, weightlifting (35.7%) of the time, rugby (21.4%), horseback riding (17.9%) as well as martial arts (14.3%) postoperatively even with previous training. The return to high levels of activity is considered as a major risk factor for disc herniation recurrence by 25.8% of surgeons. Return to high level of activity is typically recommended after 3 months by 48.4% of surgeons.

conclusionSo far no consensus on the rehabilitation protocol and return to level of activity exists. Recommendations depend on personal experience as well as the individuals' training, and typically, a period of avoidance of sport for up to 3 months is recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic and prognostic study.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementConsensusDiskectomyHumansLumbar VertebraeReturn to SportAthletesDiscectomyRehabilitationReturnSports

Identifiers

PMID37280437
OpenAlexW4379519271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.