Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37280423›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2023

Sabotage, Collusion, and Being a Feeder: Towards a New Model of Negative Social Support and Its Impact on Weight Management.

Jane Ogden, Sophia Quirke-McFarlane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Role of Household Social Support and Undermining in Dietary Change.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 'Journal of health psychology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jane OgdenSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK. J.Ogden@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4271-5621
Sophia Quirke-McFarlaneSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWhilst research indicates the positive impact of social support across a number of health domains, including weight management, not all social support is beneficial. RECENT

findingsThis paper reviews the evidence for both positive and negative social support in the context of behavioural interventions and surgery for obesity. It then presents a new model of negative social support focusing on sabotage ('active and intentional undermining of another person's weight goals'), feeding behaviour ('explicit over feeding of someone when they are not hungry or wishing not to eat'), and collusion ('passive and benign negative social support to avoid conflict') which can be conceptualised within the context of relationships as systems and the mechanisms of homeostasis. There is increasing evidence for the negative impact of social support. This new model could form the basis of further research and the development of interventions for family, friends, and partners to maximise weight loss outcomes.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight LossHumansSocial SupportBariatric surgeryCollusionDietingFeeder behaviourObesity managementSabotageSocial support

Identifiers

PMID37280423
PMCPMC10250496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.