Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37280219›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Leveraging human expert image annotations to improve pneumonia differentiation through human knowledge distillation.

Daniel Schaudt, Reinhold von Schwerin, Alexander Hafner, Pascal Riedel, Christian Späte, Manfred Reichert, Andreas Hinteregger, Meinrad Beer, Christopher Kloth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel SchaudtDepartment of Computer Science, Ulm University of Applied Science, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany. daniel.schaudt@thu.de.
Reinhold von SchwerinDepartment of Computer Science, Ulm University of Applied Science, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Alexander HafnerDepartment of Computer Science, Ulm University of Applied Science, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Pascal RiedelDepartment of Computer Science, Ulm University of Applied Science, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Christian SpäteDepartment of Computer Science, Ulm University of Applied Science, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Manfred ReichertInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, James-Franck-Ring, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Andreas HintereggerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Meinrad BeerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.
Christopher KlothDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical imaging, deep learning models can be a critical tool to shorten time-to-diagnosis and support specialized medical staff in clinical decision making. The successful training of deep learning models usually requires large amounts of quality data, which are often not available in many medical imaging tasks. In this work we train a deep learning model on university hospital chest X-ray data, containing 1082 images. The data was reviewed, differentiated into 4 causes for pneumonia, and annotated by an expert radiologist. To successfully train a model on this small amount of complex image data, we propose a special knowledge distillation process, which we call Human Knowledge Distillation. This process enables deep learning models to utilize annotated regions in the images during the training process. This form of guidance by a human expert improves model convergence and performance. We evaluate the proposed process on our study data for multiple types of models, all of which show improved results. The best model of this study, called PneuKnowNet, shows an improvement of + 2.3% points in overall accuracy compared to a baseline model and also leads to more meaningful decision regions. Utilizing this implicit data quality-quantity trade-off can be a promising approach for many scarce data domains beyond medical imaging.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPneumoniaData CurationDiagnostic ImagingHumans

Identifiers

PMID37280219
PMCPMC10243236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.